Burstein v. Tenth Manhattan Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Burstein v. Tenth Manhattan Corp.

20 A.D.2d 892, 249 N.Y.S.2d 666, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4074

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 6, 1964

StatusPublished

This text of 20 A.D.2d 892 (Burstein v. Tenth Manhattan Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Burstein v. Tenth Manhattan Corp., 20 A.D.2d 892, 249 N.Y.S.2d 666, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4074 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to reform a lease and for other relief, which was consolidated with a summary dispossess proceeding for nonpayment of rent due under the lease, plaintiff, the tenant, appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated December 24, 1963, as conditioned the granting of his motion to consolidate the action and the dispossess proceeding upon his payment to the landlord, the defendant Tenth Manhattan Corp., of all the rent which has accrued under the lease and which will accrue thereunder until final determination of the consolidated issues. Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. The stay contained in the order of this court entered January 7, 1964, is hereby dissolved, with the direction that the landlord, Tenth Manhattan Corp., may have recourse to the rents heretofore deposited by the plaintiff tenant with the Clerk of the Supreme Court, New York County, pursuant to said order. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to reform a lease and for other relief, which was consolidated with a summary dispossess proceeding for nonpayment of rent due under the lease, plaintiff, the tenant, appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated December 24, 1963, as conditioned the granting of his motion to consolidate the action and the dispossess proceeding upon his payment to the landlord, the defendant Tenth Manhattan Corp., of all the rent which has accrued under the lease and which will accrue thereunder until final determination of the consolidated issues. Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. The stay contained in the order of this court entered January 7, 1964, is hereby dissolved, with the direction that the landlord, Tenth Manhattan Corp., may have recourse to the rents heretofore deposited by the plaintiff tenant with the Clerk of the Supreme Court, New York County, pursuant to said order. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 A.D.2d 892, 249 N.Y.S.2d 666, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4074, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burstein-v-tenth-manhattan-corp-nyappdiv-1964.