Burstein v. Jacobson
This text of 278 A.D. 556 (Burstein v. Jacobson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the motion granted, and judgment is directed to be entered dismissing the complaint herein, with costs. There are no allegations in this complaint to show any interest of the State of New York in the subject matter of this litigation, or why it should entertain an action to declare the marital rights of the parties. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.; Callahan, J., concurs in part in the following memorandum: While the present complaint may be insufficient for failure to show matrimonial domicile in this State, I think that, if facts to establish such domicile were established (and plaintiff’s brief indicates it may be so established), this court should entertain a suit of the present nature. I, therefore, vote to reverse with leave, however, to plaintiff to serve an amended complaint.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
278 A.D. 556, 102 N.Y.S.2d 197, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3895, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burstein-v-jacobson-nyappdiv-1951.