Burstein v. Castellano

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Burstein v. Castellano

180 Misc. 213, 41 N.Y.S.2d 419, 1943 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1839

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedMarch 24, 1943

StatusPublished

This text of 180 Misc. 213 (Burstein v. Castellano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Burstein v. Castellano, 180 Misc. 213, 41 N.Y.S.2d 419, 1943 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1839 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1943).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Under section 684 of the Civil Practice Act, plaintiff was entitled to have a garnishee execution. The City Court order fining the defendant for contempt and directing installment payments of five dollars a month is not a bar to obtaining a garnishee execution under section 684 of the Civil Practice Act.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs, and motion denied.

Shientag, Bosenman and McLaughlin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Under section 684 of the Civil Practice Act, plaintiff was entitled to have a garnishee execution. The City Court order fining the defendant for contempt and directing installment payments of five dollars a month is not a bar to obtaining a garnishee execution under section 684 of the Civil Practice Act.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs, and motion denied.

Shientag, Bosenman and McLaughlin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

180 Misc. 213, 41 N.Y.S.2d 419, 1943 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1839, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burstein-v-castellano-nyappterm-1943.