Burson v. Edwards
1 Smith & H. 7
This text of 1 Smith & H. 7 (Burson v. Edwards) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Burson v. Edwards, 1 Smith & H. 7 (Ind. 1848).
Opinion
Held, That the instruction was wrong. That evidence of the repetition of the slander is admissable to prove the alleged malice, but not to aggravate the damages. — Forbes v. Myers, 8 Blackf. 74; Lanter v. McEwen, Id.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Forbes v. Myers
8 Blackf. 74 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1846)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Smith & H. 7, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burson-v-edwards-ind-1848.