Bursh v. Jackson

101 N.Y.S. 19
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided November 14, 1906·Published

Opinion

PÉR CURIAM.

The charge of the learned trial justice, “that, inasmuch as the driver of the truck was in the employ of the defendants, they were accountable for his negligence,” presents error for which there must and will be a reversal, and a new trial, under the authority of Howard v. Ludwig, 57 App. Div. 94, 67 N. Y. Supp. 1095, on appeal 171 N. Y. 507, 64 N. E. 172; costs to appellant to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bursh v. Jackson, 101 N.Y.S. 19 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1906).

101 N.Y.S. 19 (Bursh v. Jackson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Howard v. . Ludwig
64 N.E. 172 (New York Court of Appeals, 1902)
Howard v. Ludwig
57 A.D. 94 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1901)