Bursh v. Jackson

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Bursh v. Jackson

101 N.Y.S. 19

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedNovember 14, 1906

StatusPublished

This text of 101 N.Y.S. 19 (Bursh v. Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bursh v. Jackson, 101 N.Y.S. 19 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1906).

Pincite

Opinion

PÉR CURIAM.

The charge of the learned trial justice, “that, inasmuch as the driver of the truck was in the employ of the defendants, they were accountable for his negligence,” presents error for which there must and will be a reversal, and a new trial, under the authority of Howard v. Ludwig, 57 App. Div. 94, 67 N. Y. Supp. 1095, on appeal 171 N. Y. 507, 64 N. E. 172; costs to appellant to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PÉR CURIAM.

The charge of the learned trial justice, “that, inasmuch as the driver of the truck was in the employ of the defendants, they were accountable for his negligence,” presents error for which there must and will be a reversal, and a new trial, under the authority of Howard v. Ludwig, 57 App. Div. 94, 67 N. Y. Supp. 1095, on appeal 171 N. Y. 507, 64 N. E. 172; costs to appellant to abide the event.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

101 N.Y.S. 19, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bursh-v-jackson-nyappterm-1906.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack