Burse v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Burse v. State

476 S.W.3d 318, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1213, 2015 WL 7443734

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 24, 2015·No. ED 102413·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mark Burse appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Mo, R.Crim. P. 29.15 after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the pax-ties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court did not clearly err in denying Movant’s motion. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memo-x-andum for their information only, setting forth the l-easons for this order. The decision is affirmed. Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2015).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mark Burse appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Mo, R.Crim. P. 29.15 after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the pax-ties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court did not clearly err in denying Movant’s motion. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memo-x-andum for their information only, setting forth the l-easons for this order. The decision is affirmed. Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2015).

Burse v. State, 476 S.W.3d 318, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1213, 2015 WL 7443734 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

476 S.W.3d 318 (Burse v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.