Burse v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Burse v. State

476 S.W.3d 318, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1213, 2015 WL 7443734

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 24, 2015

DocketED 102413

StatusPublished

This text of 476 S.W.3d 318 (Burse v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Burse v. State, 476 S.W.3d 318, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1213, 2015 WL 7443734 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mark Burse appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Mo, R.Crim. P. 29.15 after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the pax-ties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court did not clearly err in denying Movant’s motion. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memo-x-andum for their information only, setting forth the l-easons for this order. The decision is affirmed. Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2015).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mark Burse appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Mo, R.Crim. P. 29.15 after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the pax-ties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court did not clearly err in denying Movant’s motion. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memo-x-andum for their information only, setting forth the l-easons for this order. The decision is affirmed. Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2015).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

476 S.W.3d 318, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1213, 2015 WL 7443734, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burse-v-state-moctapp-2015.