Burse v. Bristol

203 A.D.2d 962, 612 N.Y.S.2d 990
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 15, 1994·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Petition unanimously dismissed without costs. Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to compel County Court to hold a hearing on her pre-indictment motion to suppress evidence. Although CPL 710.50 provides that a defendant who has been held by a local criminal court for action by a Grand Jury may make a suppression motion in the superior court that impaneled or will impanel such Grand Jury, the statute does not mandate that a suppression hearing be held prior to indictment. Because petitioner has not demonstrated a clear legal right to the relief she seeks, mandamus does not lie (see, Matter of Scherbyn v Wayne-Finger Lakes Bd. of Coop. Educ. Servs., 77 NY2d 753, 757; Matter of Legal Aid Socy. v Scheinman, 53 NY2d 12, 16-17; Matter of Hamptons Hosp. & Med. Ctr. v Moore, 52 NY2d 88, 97). (Original Article 78 Proceeding.) Present — Denman, P. J., Lawton, Fallon, Doerr and Davis, JJ. (Filed Mar. 24, 1994.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burse v. Bristol, 203 A.D.2d 962, 612 N.Y.S.2d 990 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

203 A.D.2d 962 (Burse v. Bristol) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Moss v. Spitzer
19 A.D.3d 599 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Torres v. Smith
203 A.D.2d 962 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)