Burse v. Bezio

69 A.D.3d 1068, 891 N.Y.2d 684
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 14, 2010·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Petitioner, an inmate, commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to annul a tier III disciplinary determination which found him guilty of possessing a controlled substance. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed and all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record. Accordingly, petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled and this matter is therefore moot (see Matter of Hart v Fischer, 60 AD3d 1226 [2009]).

Cardona, EJ., Peters, Lahtinen, Kavanagh and Garry, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burse v. Bezio, 69 A.D.3d 1068, 891 N.Y.2d 684 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

69 A.D.3d 1068 (Burse v. Bezio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hodge v. Bezio
74 A.D.3d 1696 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Townsley v. Lempke
74 A.D.3d 1661 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Green v. Fischer
74 A.D.3d 1645 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Rivera v. Bezio
74 A.D.3d 1679 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Lopez v. Fischer
74 A.D.3d 1605 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Perez v. Fischer
74 A.D.3d 1606 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Mendez v. Bezio
73 A.D.3d 1368 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)