Burrus v. HBE Corp.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Burrus v. HBE Corp.

263 S.W.3d 775, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1267, 2008 WL 4204716

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Burrus v. HBE Corp.. Read the opinion of the Court — 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1659 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 16, 2008·No. No. ED 90392·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, HBE Corporation, appeals the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of St. Louis County following a jury verdict rendered in favor of the plaintiff, Wayne Burrus. The jury assessed damages against HBE for commissions, which Burrus earned while in HBE’s employ but which HBE failed to pay. Finding no error, we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

The trial court’s judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(5).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, HBE Corporation, appeals the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of St. Louis County following a jury verdict rendered in favor of the plaintiff, Wayne Burrus. The jury assessed damages against HBE for commissions, which Burrus earned while in HBE’s employ but which HBE failed to pay. Finding no error, we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

The trial court’s judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(5).

Burrus v. HBE Corp., 263 S.W.3d 775, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1267, 2008 WL 4204716 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

263 S.W.3d 775 (Burrus v. HBE Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.