Burrus v. Department of Agriculture

575 F.2d 1258, 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 10930
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedMay 31, 1978
Docket77-1883
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 575 F.2d 1258 (Burrus v. Department of Agriculture) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burrus v. Department of Agriculture, 575 F.2d 1258, 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 10930 (8th Cir. 1978).

Opinion

575 F.2d 1258

C. D. BURRUS and Donald L. Troutman, d/b/a Burrus and
Troutman Livestock and Hauling, Petitioners,
v.
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE and the Packers and
Stockyards Administration, Respondents.

No. 77-1883.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.

Submitted May 18, 1978.
Decided May 31, 1978.

Richard A. Koehler, Livestock Marketing Assn., Kansas City, Mo., for petitioners.

Barbara Allen Babcock, Morton Hollander and Robert Kaplan (argued), Civil Div., U. S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., and James Michael Kelly, Raymond W. Fullerton and John E. Ford, U. S. Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, D. C., on brief, for respondents.

Before HEANEY and STEPHENSON, Circuit Judges, and BECKER, Senior District Judge.*

PER CURIAM.

C. D. Burrus and Donald L. Troutman seek review of an order of the Secretary of Agriculture. The Secretary held that the petitioners violated the Packers and Stockyards Act, 1921, 7 U.S.C. § 181 et seq., and the regulations issued pursuant to the Act by (1) operating a livestock scale which failed to comply with requirements because it was improperly balanced; (2) selling livestock to packers at false and incorrect weights obtained by adding an arbitrary number of pounds to the purchase weights of livestock; (3) issuing and maintaining scale tickets and invoices which showed false and incorrect weights; and (4) collecting money from packers on the basis of the false records.

We have carefully reviewed the record and find that the order of the Secretary is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole, that no error of law appears and that an opinion would be without precedential value. For these reasons, we deny the petition for review and enforce the order of the Secretary of Agriculture without opinion. See Rule 14 of the Rules of this Court.

*

The Honorable William H. Becker, Senior District Judge, Western District of Missouri, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gerace v. Utica Veal Co., Inc.
580 F. Supp. 1465 (N.D. New York, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
575 F.2d 1258, 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 10930, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burrus-v-department-of-agriculture-ca8-1978.