Burrows v. Paquin

Superior Court of Rhode Island

Burrows v. Paquin

8 R.I. Dec. 269

CourtSuperior Court of Rhode Island

DecidedApril 20, 1932

DocketNo. 84884

StatusPublished

This text of 8 R.I. Dec. 269 (Burrows v. Paquin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Burrows v. Paquin, 8 R.I. Dec. 269 (R.I. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

CHURCHILL, J.

Heard on defendant’s motion for a new trial after a verdict for tbe plaintiff for $576.65 in an action for negligence.

For plaintiff: John DiLibero. For defendant: Hinckley, Allen, Til-linghast, Phillips & Wheeler.

William T. Burrows was the owner of the truck which was being operated by Raymond H. Bowers (Raymond H. Bowers vs. Wilfred J. Paquin, No. 84883).

This case depends upon the case of Raymond B. Bowers vs. Wilfred J. Paquin, No. 84883, in which this day a rescript was filed denying the motion of the defendant for a new trial.

It is not suggested in the instant case that the damages are excessive. The verdict does justice between the parties and the defendant’s motion for a new trial is hereby denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CHURCHILL, J.

Heard on defendant’s motion for a new trial after a verdict for tbe plaintiff for $576.65 in an action for negligence.

For plaintiff: John DiLibero. For defendant: Hinckley, Allen, Til-linghast, Phillips & Wheeler.

William T. Burrows was the owner of the truck which was being operated by Raymond H. Bowers (Raymond H. Bowers vs. Wilfred J. Paquin, No. 84883).

This case depends upon the case of Raymond B. Bowers vs. Wilfred J. Paquin, No. 84883, in which this day a rescript was filed denying the motion of the defendant for a new trial.

It is not suggested in the instant case that the damages are excessive. The verdict does justice between the parties and the defendant’s motion for a new trial is hereby denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 R.I. Dec. 269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burrows-v-paquin-risuperct-1932.