Burrows v. Goldberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Burrows v. Goldberg

246 A.D. 822

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 15, 1936·Published

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for alleged malpractice of a physician the jury, after nearly four hours of deliberation, found a verdict for the defendant. The appeal is based solely on the ground that the trial court in its charge made remarks on the evidence prejudicial to the plaintiff. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Young, Carswell, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for alleged malpractice of a physician the jury, after nearly four hours of deliberation, found a verdict for the defendant. The appeal is based solely on the ground that the trial court in its charge made remarks on the evidence prejudicial to the plaintiff. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Young, Carswell, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ.

Burrows v. Goldberg, 246 A.D. 822 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

246 A.D. 822 (Burrows v. Goldberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.