Burrows v. Burrows

765 N.E.2d 296, 97 N.Y.2d 695, 739 N.Y.S.2d 92, 2002 N.Y. LEXIS 76
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 15, 2002
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 765 N.E.2d 296 (Burrows v. Burrows) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burrows v. Burrows, 765 N.E.2d 296, 97 N.Y.2d 695, 739 N.Y.S.2d 92, 2002 N.Y. LEXIS 76 (N.Y. 2002).

Opinion

Motion by defendant for leave to appeal denied. Cross motion by plaintiff for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that plaintiff, having taken no appeal to the Appellate Division, may not appeal to the Court of Appeals from the Appellate Division order of affirmance (see, Dellavalle v Howell Co., 93 NY2d 953).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Melissa S. v. Frederick T.
818 N.E.2d 650 (New York Court of Appeals, 2004)
Matter of Lisa Marie S.
100 N.Y.2d 575 (New York Court of Appeals, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
765 N.E.2d 296, 97 N.Y.2d 695, 739 N.Y.S.2d 92, 2002 N.Y. LEXIS 76, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burrows-v-burrows-ny-2002.