Burroughs Wellcome & Co. v. Weissbard
23 A.2d 396, 130 N.J. Eq. 605, 1942 N.J. LEXIS 565
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Egan and reported at 129 N. J. Eq. 563.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Porter, Colie, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 12.
For reversal — Case, Perskie, JJ. 2.’
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Burroughs Wellcome & Co. v. Weissbard, 23 A.2d 396, 130 N.J. Eq. 605, 1942 N.J. LEXIS 565 (N.J. Ct. App. 1942).
23 A.2d 396 (Burroughs Wellcome & Co. v. Weissbard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Vornado, Inc. v. Corning Glass Works
388 F.2d 117 (Third Circuit, 1968)
Texas Co. v. Di Gaetano
177 A.2d 273 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1962)