Home/New Jersey Superior Court App Division/Burroughs Wellcome & Co. v. Weissbard

Burroughs Wellcome & Co. v. Weissbard

23 A.2d 396, 130 N.J. Eq. 605, 1942 N.J. LEXIS 565
CourtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
DecidedJanuary 9, 1942
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 23 A.2d 396 (Burroughs Wellcome & Co. v. Weissbard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burroughs Wellcome & Co. v. Weissbard, 23 A.2d 396, 130 N.J. Eq. 605, 1942 N.J. LEXIS 565 (N.J. Ct. App. 1942).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Egan and reported at 129 N. J. Eq. 563.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Porter, Colie, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 12.

For reversal — Case, Perskie, JJ. 2.’

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Vornado, Inc. v. Corning Glass Works
388 F.2d 117 (Third Circuit, 1968)
Texas Co. v. Di Gaetano
177 A.2d 273 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 A.2d 396, 130 N.J. Eq. 605, 1942 N.J. LEXIS 565, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burroughs-wellcome-co-v-weissbard-njsuperctappdiv-1942.