Burroughs-Wellcome & Co. v. United States

37 Cust. Ct. 432
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Burroughs-Wellcome & Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 35 Cust. Ct. 160
United States Customs Court·Decided December 6, 1956·No. No. 60399; protests 193735-K, etc. (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of dried digitalis lanata leaves the same in all material respects as those involved in Burroughs-Wellcome Co., Inc. v. United States (35 Cust. Ct. 160, C. D. 1738) [affirmed in United States v. Burroughs-Wellcome Co., Inc., 43 C. C. P. A. 142, C. A. D. 621], the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burroughs-Wellcome & Co. v. United States, 37 Cust. Ct. 432 (cusc 1956).

37 Cust. Ct. 432 (Burroughs-Wellcome & Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Burroughs-Wellcome Co. v. United States
35 Cust. Ct. 160 (U.S. Customs Court, 1955)