Burroughs v. White

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Burroughs v. White

140 N.E. 940, 246 Mass. 258, 1923 Mass. LEXIS 1156

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided September 14, 1923·Published·Cited by 23 cases

Opinion

Rugg, C.J.

This is an appeal from an order by a probate judge denying a motion to frame issues to a jury on a petition for the allowance of a will. It was heard and decided and comes before us on appeal on statement by counsel for the contestant of expected proof.

The governing principles of law have been stated in the opinion in Clark v. McNeil, ante, 250, just decided, and need not be repeated. Fuller v. Sylvia, 240 Mass. 49. Cook v. Mosher, 243 Mass. 149.

It would serve no useful purpose to narrate the statement of facts. The case is very close. Some of us would have granted the issues. But we all are of opinion, though with hesitation, that the decision of the Probate Court ought not to be reversed.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rugg, C.J.

This is an appeal from an order by a probate judge denying a motion to frame issues to a jury on a petition for the allowance of a will. It was heard and decided and comes before us on appeal on statement by counsel for the contestant of expected proof.

The governing principles of law have been stated in the opinion in Clark v. McNeil, ante, 250, just decided, and need not be repeated. Fuller v. Sylvia, 240 Mass. 49. Cook v. Mosher, 243 Mass. 149.

It would serve no useful purpose to narrate the statement of facts. The case is very close. Some of us would have granted the issues. But we all are of opinion, though with hesitation, that the decision of the Probate Court ought not to be reversed.

Order affirmed.

Burroughs v. White, 140 N.E. 940, 246 Mass. 258, 1923 Mass. LEXIS 1156 (Mass. 1923).

Pincite

140 N.E. 940 (Burroughs v. White) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related