Burroughs v. Selleck

185 Ill. App. 446
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedMarch 11, 1914
DocketGen. No. 18,436
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 185 Ill. App. 446 (Burroughs v. Selleck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burroughs v. Selleck, 185 Ill. App. 446 (Ill. Ct. App. 1914).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Duncan

delivered the opinion of the court.

6. Vendor and purchaser, § 317*—when direction of verdict for plaintiff in action for purchase money is error. In an action to recover a balance due on a contract for the sale of real estate where defendant filed a counterclaim for damages resulting from false and fraudulent representations made by the plaintiff as to the condition of the property, action of court in excluding all of defendant’s evidence and directing a verdict for plaintiff held error, it appearing that defendant’s evidence tended to prove every element of fraud and deceit and that he was entitled to have a jury pass upon the merits of his defense. 7. Vendor and purchaser, § 348*—measure of damages for false representations hy vendor. For fraud and deceit in inducing a person to purchase real estate upon representations that there was a certain number of fruit trees thereon, the measure of damages is the difference between the value of the land as conveyed to him and the same land with the number of fruit trees thereon as represented.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jones v. Roberts
188 Ill. App. 609 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
185 Ill. App. 446, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burroughs-v-selleck-illappct-1914.