Burroughs v. Marr

736 F.2d 1341, 116 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3115, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 20814
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 5, 1984·No. 82-4650·Published

Opinion

736 F.2d 1341

115 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2199, 116 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3115,
99 Lab.Cas. P 10,633

Benjamin R. BURROUGHS, on Behalf of OPERATING ENGINEERS
LOCAL UNION NO. 3, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Dale MARR, Harold Huston, James R. Ivy, Harold K. Lewis,
Donald R. Strate, and Dennis Wright, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 82-4650.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

July 5, 1984.

Michael Friedman, Siegel, Friedman & Dickstein, Oakland, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant.

John J. Davis, McCarthy, Johnson & Miller, Kimball S. Atwood, Cooley, Godward, Castro, Huddleson, San Francisco, Cal., for defendants-appellees.

ORDER

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.

Case below: 559 F.Supp. 141.

Before KENNEDY and BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judges, and EAST*, District Judge.

The opinion filed December 15, 1983 is hereby withdrawn. The appeal is dismissed as moot.

Withdrawn on rehearing, 9th Cir., 742 F.2d-509.

*

Honorable William G. East, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Oregon, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burroughs v. Marr, 736 F.2d 1341, 116 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3115, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 20814 (9th Cir. 1984).

736 F.2d 1341 (Burroughs v. Marr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

BURROUGHS OBO OPERATING ENG'RS LOC. U. v. Marr
559 F. Supp. 141 (N.D. California, 1982)