Burroughs v. Marr
This text of 736 F.2d 1341 (Burroughs v. Marr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
736 F.2d 1341
115 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2199, 116 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3115,
99 Lab.Cas. P 10,633
Benjamin R. BURROUGHS, on Behalf of OPERATING ENGINEERS
LOCAL UNION NO. 3, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Dale MARR, Harold Huston, James R. Ivy, Harold K. Lewis,
Donald R. Strate, and Dennis Wright, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 82-4650.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
July 5, 1984.
Michael Friedman, Siegel, Friedman & Dickstein, Oakland, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant.
John J. Davis, McCarthy, Johnson & Miller, Kimball S. Atwood, Cooley, Godward, Castro, Huddleson, San Francisco, Cal., for defendants-appellees.
ORDER
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.
Case below: 559 F.Supp. 141.
Before KENNEDY and BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judges, and EAST*, District Judge.
The opinion filed December 15, 1983 is hereby withdrawn. The appeal is dismissed as moot.
Withdrawn on rehearing, 9th Cir., 742 F.2d-509.
Honorable William G. East, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Oregon, sitting by designation
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
736 F.2d 1341, 116 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3115, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 20814, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burroughs-v-marr-ca9-1984.