Burroughs v. Makowski

35 F. App'x 402
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided May 16, 2002·No. No. 00-1471·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner has filed a petition for rehearing. Upon good cause shown, the motion is granted.

The prior decision of this court, filed on February 28, 2002, is modified to the extent that the final paragraph of that opinion shall reflect that the remedy is to reverse and remand to the district court in order to determine whether the petitioner can show “cause and prejudice” under Wainwright v. Sykes, 433 U.S. 72, 97 S.Ct. 2497, 53 L.Ed.2d 594 (1977), for the procedural default. In all other respects, the prior decision is adopted in full. If the district court finds that the petitioner has not shown cause and prejudice, then no writ should issue. However, if the court finds that the petitioner has shown cause and prejudice, then it should then determine whether a writ should issue.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burroughs v. Makowski, 35 F. App'x 402 (6th Cir. 2002).

35 F. App'x 402 (Burroughs v. Makowski) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hannah v. Bock
447 F. Supp. 2d 798 (E.D. Michigan, 2006)
Alexander v. Smith
342 F. Supp. 2d 677 (E.D. Michigan, 2004)
Kylleen Hargrave-Thomas v. Joan Yukins
374 F.3d 383 (Sixth Circuit, 2004)
Hargrave-Thomas v. Yukins
Sixth Circuit, 2004
Friday v. Pitcher
99 F. App'x 568 (Sixth Circuit, 2004)
Fex v. Cason
72 F. App'x 254 (Sixth Circuit, 2003)
Meade v. Lavigne
265 F. Supp. 2d 849 (E.D. Michigan, 2003)
Alexander v. Straub
52 F. App'x 823 (Sixth Circuit, 2002)