Burroughs v. Condit

6 N.J.L. 365
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedNovember 15, 1822
StatusPublished

This text of 6 N.J.L. 365 (Burroughs v. Condit) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burroughs v. Condit, 6 N.J.L. 365 (N.J. 1822).

Opinion

Per Curiam.'

Let the judgment be affirmed.

Kirkpatrick, C. J.

The affidavit discloses the true cause of the action, viz : the agreement of the party to pay. The statute of 29th January, 1817, does not require the affidavit to set forth the true consideration, but only the true cause of action. This statute is now repealed by the act of 24th [368]*368of February, 1820. By this latter act, the true consideration of the bond is required to be stated, but not by the former. •

Ford, J.

There is a statute which requires that an affidavit shall be made of the cause of action, in order to hold to bail. Pat. N. J. L. 348. That statute is always satisfied, that by stating in the affidavit, that the cause of action is a bond of a certain date. I think, therefore, that the affidavit in this case is sufficient.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 N.J.L. 365, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burroughs-v-condit-nj-1822.