Burroughs Corp. v. Kramarsky

Second Circuit

Burroughs Corp. v. Kramarsky

725 F.2d 149, 33 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1190

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Burroughs Corp. v. Kramarsky. Read the opinion of the Court — 650 F.2d 1308 →

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided December 27, 1983·No. No. 17, Docket 80-7127·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

For the reasons stated today in our opinion in Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Kramarsky, 725 F.2d 146, on remand from the United States Supreme Court, Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., — U.S. —, 103 S.Ct. 2890, 77 L.Ed.2d 490 (1983), we affirm the judgment of the district court enjoining enforcement of New York’s Human Rights Law, N.Y.Exec.Law § 296 (McKinney 1972 & Supp.1980-81). For the reasons stated in our original opinion in the present case, 650 F.2d 1308, 1309, plaintiff’s claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is remanded for such further consideration as may be appropriate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

For the reasons stated today in our opinion in Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Kramarsky, 725 F.2d 146, on remand from the United States Supreme Court, Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., — U.S. —, 103 S.Ct. 2890, 77 L.Ed.2d 490 (1983), we affirm the judgment of the district court enjoining enforcement of New York’s Human Rights Law, N.Y.Exec.Law § 296 (McKinney 1972 & Supp.1980-81). For the reasons stated in our original opinion in the present case, 650 F.2d 1308, 1309, plaintiff’s claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is remanded for such further consideration as may be appropriate.

Burroughs Corp. v. Kramarsky, 725 F.2d 149, 33 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1190 (2d Cir. 1983).

Pincite

725 F.2d 149 (Burroughs Corp. v. Kramarsky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related