Burritt v. Koster, Bial & Co.

New York Court of Common Pleas

Burritt v. Koster, Bial & Co.

27 N.Y.S. 353, 7 Misc. 75, 57 N.Y. St. Rep. 461

CourtNew York Court of Common Pleas

DecidedFebruary 5, 1894

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 27 N.Y.S. 353 (Burritt v. Koster, Bial & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Burritt v. Koster, Bial & Co., 27 N.Y.S. 353, 7 Misc. 75, 57 N.Y. St. Rep. 461 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

PÉR CURIAM.

We suspended the decision to which we inclined on the argument that we might consider the authorities to which counsel for the appellant earnestly entreated our attention. We have examined those authorities, and we find them of no effect in modifying our impression of the propriety of the order in question. The decision of the learned judge at special term is firmly supported by the reasons upon which he grounds it-, and is vindicated by conclusive authority. Britton v. MacDonald, 3 Misc. Rep. 514, 23 N. Y. Supp. 350. While we have every disposition to assist the appellant in his declared purpose of protecting the process of the court, we cannot disregard the settled rules of law even in the pursuit of so laudable an object. Order affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PÉR CURIAM.

We suspended the decision to which we inclined on the argument that we might consider the authorities to which counsel for the appellant earnestly entreated our attention. We have examined those authorities, and we find them of no effect in modifying our impression of the propriety of the order in question. The decision of the learned judge at special term is firmly supported by the reasons upon which he grounds it-, and is vindicated by conclusive authority. Britton v. MacDonald, 3 Misc. Rep. 514, 23 N. Y. Supp. 350. While we have every disposition to assist the appellant in his declared purpose of protecting the process of the court, we cannot disregard the settled rules of law even in the pursuit of so laudable an object. Order affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 N.Y.S. 353, 7 Misc. 75, 57 N.Y. St. Rep. 461, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burritt-v-koster-bial-co-nyctcompl-1894.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack