Burrison, Wesley v. Allegis Group

2018 TN WC 21
CourtTennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
DecidedMarch 6, 2018
Docket2017-01-0408
StatusPublished

This text of 2018 TN WC 21 (Burrison, Wesley v. Allegis Group) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burrison, Wesley v. Allegis Group, 2018 TN WC 21 (Tenn. Super. Ct. 2018).

Opinion

FILED ~:Larch 6~ 201,8

lN COURTOF V\ ORJITRS' C01IPENS_'\TION CL.AIMS

Time-:2:01 PAl

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT CHATTANOOGA

Wesley Burrison, ) Docket No.: 2017-01-0408 Employee, ) v. ) Allegis Group, ) State File No.: 24642-2017 Employer, ) And ) Insurance Company of North America, ) Judge Audrey Headrick Carrier. )

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER

This matter came before the Court on February 15, 2018, on Wesley Burrison's Request for Expedited Hearing. The central legal issue is whether Mr. Burrison is likely to establish at trial that he is entitled to temporary partial disability benefiu .1 For the reasons set forth below, the Court holds he is entitled to the requested benefits.

History of Claim

Allegis Group, a temporary agency, hired Mr. Burrison on February 22, 2017, and placed him at Volkswagen as a production worker. 2 He injured his back on April 5 while manually lifting a heavy transfer case. Mr. Burrison went to the Volkswagen On-Site

1 The Dispute Certification Notice (DCN) only certified the issues of temporary disability benefits and mileage reimbursement. The parties voluntarily resolved the mileage issue. However, since the parties' prehearing briefs addressed a dispute regarding medical benefits, the Court advised that it could not hear evidence on that issue since it was not a certified issue in the DCN. After the hearing, the Court entered an Order referring the claim to mediation. 2 The pmties referred to Allegis Group as Aerotek, and the Court infers they are affiliated.

1 Medical Clinic (OMC) during his shift, where he selected Dr. Allen Von Gremp from a panel. 3

Warren Rafiel, Human Resources Representative for Allegis Group, met with Mr. Burrison for a corrective action meeting on April 10. Mr. Rafiel notified Mr. Burrison that he was on level two of a four-level disciplinary policy. Mr. Burrison produced work excuses for March 16-17, March 27-29, and April 5-6. (Ex. 10.) Mr. Rafiel explained that an employee is "at the end of [his] assignment with [Allegis Group]" [terminated] "when he reaches the fourth level."

One day later, Mr. Rafiel held a corrective action meeting with Mr. Burrison and his Volkswagen supervisor, Ken Pippin, to notify Mr. Burrison he was on level three for job performance. Mr. Rafiel described four separate incidents in the Corrective Action form. The incidents involved taking unscheduled bathroom breaks, leaving the production line without notifying a team leader or supervisor, and failing to work in Pitch 9 with coworker Lamika Ball. Mr. Rafiel included the Pitch 9 incident in the "Team Member Comments" section, but Mr. Burrison disputed the incident was described on the form when he signed it.

Mr. Burrison testified he takes Metformin, since he is diabetic, which causes him to have diarrhea and forces him at times to use the restroom unexpectedly. He stated he had a private conversation with Mr. Pippin and explained his medical issue. Mr. Burrison stated Mr. Pippin told him he needed "to man up and hold it 'til break time." Mr. Rafiel acknowledged that Mr. Burrison raised his medical issue during the April 11 corrective action meeting, but it was not a sufficient excuse. Further, Mr. Burrison also explained his refusal to work in Pitch 9 was unrelated to a previous dispute involving a coworker.

As for the events of April 11, Mr. Rafiel testified Mr. Burri son said he did not feel comfortable training on Pitch 9 with Ms. Ball. Mr. Rafiel stated that Mr. Burrison also expressed concerns about handling the transfer case on Pitch 9. Mr. Pippin instructed Mr. Burrison to use the overhead crane and notify a team leader if he had any problems. Mr. Rafiel testified that Mr. Burrison initially started walking towards the line and then returned telling him, "I don't need this s**t." He stated he asked Mr. Burrison, "Are you telling me you're refusing to go to your pitch and train?" Mr. Burrison responded, "Yes." Mr. Rafiel then asked for Mr. Burrison's badge and walked him out. Further, Mr. Rafiel stated that Mr. Burrison "chose to resign before getting to the fourth level.''

Mr. Rafiel confirmed that Allegis Group prepared limited documentation regarding Mr. Burrison's alleged resignation on April 11. Allegis Group did not

3 Since the Court is limited to the issue certified on the DCN, it will not address disputed issue of the emergency room bill at this time. For that reason, the parties did not admit the hospital records into evidence.

2 complete a Separation Notice. Mr. Rafiel confirmed that the only documentation that references Mr. Burrison's "resignation with no notice" is a digital screen shot of RWS, which is Allegis Group's computerized personnel system. (Ex. 12.) A colleague of Mr. Rafiel' s prepared the R WS entry on April 14 and entered April 11 as the effective date. Mr. Rafiel did not have Mr. Burrison complete a resignation form.

Mr. Burrison's testimony differed dramatically from Mr. Rafiel's. He denied knowing Ms. Ball worked on Pitch 9. Mr. Burrison stated he refused to work on Pitch 9 because his back hurt. He did not think he could do the bending, twisting, and lifting involved on the job. Mr. Burrison was also worried about the transfer case causing additional injury to his back. He identified Mr. Rafiel as the individual who terminated him and walked him out of the building. Further, Mr. Burrison stated it took Allegis Group three weeks after his injury to schedule his first appointment with Dr. Von Gremp, his panel physician.

Nineteen days after his work injury, Allegis Group scheduled Mr. Burrison to see Dr. Von Gremp. He told Dr. Von Gremp that Allegis Group terminated him. For that reason, Dr. Von Gremp provided no restrictions. After conservative treatment failed, Dr. Von Gremp referred Mr. Burrison to Dr. Rickey Hutcheson, an orthopedic surgeon. At his first visit with Dr. Hutcheson, Mr. Burrison told him that Allegis Group terminated him. From May 23 until December 12, Dr. Hutcheson provided Mr. Burrison with sedentary work restrictions. Mr. Burrison's high blood sugar level prevented Dr. Hutcheson from performing surgery, and Dr. Hutchison placed him at maximum medical improvement (MMI) on December 12.

Mr. Burrison argued that Allegis Group terminated him without cause on April 11 following his April 5 injury. He also argued Allegis Group delayed him seeing his panel physician for three weeks, for a back injury that is serious enough to require surgery. Therefore, Mr. Burrison requested that the Court order Allegis Group to pay him temporary partial disability benefits.

Allegis Group countered that Mr. Burrison voluntarily resigned on April 11. 4 Based on the medical proof, Allegis Group argued Mr. Burrison failed to show he is temporarily and totally di abled from working in the open labor market, based on the factors in Simpson v. Sattetjield, 564 S.W.2d 953, 955 (Tenn. 1978). 5 It further argued Mr. Burrison failed to prove the dates he believes he is entitled to receive temporary

4 The Court notes Allegis Group made a contrary argument in the DCN and its prehearing brief and contended it terminated Mr. Burri son for cause. 5 The Simpson factors for temporary total disability benefits require that an employee "must prove that he was ( 1) totally disabled to work by a compensable injury; (2) that there is a causal connection between the injury and his inability to work; and (3) the duration of that period of disability."

3 disability benefits. Therefore, Allegis Group requested that the Court deny Mr. Burrison' s request.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carter v. First Source Furniture Group
92 S.W.3d 367 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 2002)
Simpson v. Satterfield
564 S.W.2d 953 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2018 TN WC 21, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burrison-wesley-v-allegis-group-tennworkcompcl-2018.