Burris v. Ware

Fourth Circuit

Burris v. Ware

600 F. App'x 111

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedApril 20, 2015

DocketNo. 14-7473

StatusPublished

This text of 600 F. App'x 111 (Burris v. Ware) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Burris v. Ware, 600 F. App'x 111 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Shawn Justin Burris appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. '§ 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Shawn Justin Burris appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. '§ 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

600 F. App'x 111, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burris-v-ware-ca4-2015.