Burris v. State
698 So. 2d 933, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 10272, 1997 WL 559432
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 10, 1997·No. No. 96-2141·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
This case reflects judicial and prosecutorial errors which compel reversal.
The trial court did not comply with Coney v. State, 653 So.2d 1009 (Fla.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 315, 133 L.Ed.2d 218 (1995), although the trial occurred in April 1996. It failed to instruct the jury properly, although there was a timely request and objection.1 The prosecutor repeatedly commented on appellant’s right to remain silent.
Accordingly, we reverse and remand for new trial.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Burris v. State, 698 So. 2d 933, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 10272, 1997 WL 559432 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).
698 So. 2d 933 (Burris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Paston v. WIGGS CONTRACTING
698 So. 2d 933 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)