Burris v. Burris
This text of 643 S.W.2d 570 (Burris v. Burris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant has petitioned for reconsideration of her motion for rule on the clerk to lodge the transcript. The record was refused by the clerk, and appellant’s motion for a rule denied by us, because Notice of Appeal was not timely filed. Appellant urges that we treat the failure as an unavoidable casualty, which we have done on occasion when the record was unavoidably tendered out of time. However, the rule of unavoidable casualty applies to the lodging of the record on appeal and not to the failure to file Notice of Appeal, the latter being jurisdictional. City of Hot Springs v. McGeorge Contracting Company, Inc., 260 Ark. 636, 543 S.W.2d 475 (1976) and Ward v. Universal C.I.T. Credit Corp., 228 Ark. 275, 307 S.W.2d 73 (1957).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
643 S.W.2d 570, 278 Ark. 106, 1982 Ark. LEXIS 1614, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burris-v-burris-ark-1982.