Burris, Johnson Walter

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 6, 2015
DocketWR-83,246-01
StatusPublished

This text of Burris, Johnson Walter (Burris, Johnson Walter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burris, Johnson Walter, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

April30, 2015

Mr. Abel Acosta, Clerk Court of Criminal Appeals , P.O. Box 12308 Austin, Texas 78711-2308

Re: Ex parte Johnson Walter Burris, Cause Number: CR08-00113 (In the 294 1h Judicial District Court of VanZandt County, Texas).

)o- Motion for Leave of Court to File Original Petition for Writ of Mandamus

Dear Clerk:

Enclosed please find the original copy of Applicant Burris' Motion for Leave of the Court to file Original Petition for Writ of Mandamus, to be filed among the papers in the above-styled and numbered cause pursuant to Article 11.07, V.A.C.C.P.

Thank you for your kind attention to this matter.

Sincerely,

" Applicant, Pro se TDCJ-CID#01745516 Estelle Unit 264 FM 3478 Huntsville, Texas 77320

Enclosure

Cc: Abel Acosta, Clerk Court of Criminal Appeals

File RECEIVED IN COURT OF CR!Mif\l~L APPEALS MAV 08 2Ci5 Absl Acosta, Clerk . ~·

WRIT NUMBER: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ (Trial Case Number: CROS-00113)

JOHNSON WALTER BURRIS, § IN TDCJ-CID#01745516, Relator, Prose, § § THE v. § § COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS THE HONRABLE TERESA DRUM, § ACTING IN HER OFFICIAL § AUSTIN, TEXAS CAPACITY AS JUDGE OF THE § 263RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT § OF VAN-ZANDT COUNTY TEXAS, § Respondent. §

APPLICANT BURRIS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS WITH BRIEF IN SUPPORT

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS:

COMES NOW, Johnson W. Burris, TDCJ-CID#01745516, Relator, prose, in the

above-styled and numbered cause and files this, his Motion for Leave to file Original

Writ of Mandamus with Brief in Support, pursuant to Article 11.07, Section 3(C) of the

Texas Code of Criminal Procedure and in support thereof would respectfully show the

Court as follows:

I. Relator

1. Johnson w·. Burris, TDCJ-CID#Ol745516, is an offender incarcerated in the

Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division ("TDCJ-CID"),

and is appearingpra se, and can be located at: Johnson W. Burris, TDCJ-CID#01745516,

Estelle Unit, 264 FM 3478, Huntsville, Texas, 77320.

Burris Writ of Mandamus 2. Relator has exhausted all his remedies and has no other adequate remedy at law.

3. Relator filed his original Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus on or about May

31, 2014, with the clerk of the convicting court. Texas law requires the clerk of the

district court to serve a copy of the Relator's writ of habeas corpus be served by the

district clerk upon the district attorney within 15 days of Applicant filing his writ of

habeas corpus application. After the expiration of the time allowed for the State to

respond has passed the trial court is allowed 20 days to determine whether the application

contains allegations of controverted, previously unresolved facts material to the legality

of the applicant's confinement exist. Art. 11.07, §3(c). If the trial court determines that

the application for writ of habeas ·corpus presents such issues it "shall enter an order

within 20 days of the expiration of the time allowed for the state to reply, designating

issues of fact to be resolved." Id. In the present case, the trial court has not designated

issues to Relator's knowledge; therefore, the habeas writ application should have been

transmitted to this Court on or about July 03, 2014, but has not been transmitted as ofthis

date.

4. To date, no designation of issues has been entered by the trial judge and Relator's

application seeking habeas corpus relief has laid fallow since the date of its filing almost (

one-year ago.

5. The act sought to be compelled is ministerial, not discretionary in nature. The

Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, Art. 11.07 Section 3(c) require~ Respondent to

immediately transmit to the Court of Criminal Appeals a copy of the application for writ

of habeas corpus, any answers filed, and a certificate reciting the date upon which that

finding was made, if the convicting court decides that there are no issues to be resolved.

Burris Writ of Mandamus 2 . •' No copy of the application for writ of habeas corpus, any answers filed, and a certificate

reciting the date upon which that finding was made and transmitted to the Court of

Criminal Appeals. Had Respondent directed such documents be transmitted to the Court

of Criminal Appeals as required statute, Relator would have received notice from this

Court. Petitioner avers that while the trial court has not in fact designated issues requiring

resolution and Relator's writ of habeas corpus application has been pending in the trial

court for approximately eleven (11) months since that time, which is inherently

unreasonable.

II. RESPONDENT

5. Respondent, the Honorable Teresa Drum, acting in her official capacity as Judge

of the 294th Judicial District Court of Van-Zandt County, has a ministerial duty to

resolve issues she may designate requiring resolution and resolve said issues by all

customary means in a timely manner, as the Great Writ is one of expediency so as to

avoid innocent citizens from languishing in pnson needlessly. Judge Teresa Drum,

presiding judge ofthe 294th Judicial District Court ofVan-Zandt County, Texas, may be

served at her place of business at: Judge Teresa Drum, presiding Judge of the 294th

Judicial District Court of Van-Zandt County, Texas, Van-Zandt County Courthouse

121 E. Dallas St., Suite 301, Canton Texas, 75103.

Burris Writ of Mandamus 3 III. Violation of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure

3. The Respondent violated Article 11 07 Section 3(c) of the Texas Code of

Criminal Procedure by failing to provide a copy of the application for writ of habeas

corpus, any answers filed, and a certificate reciting the date upon which that finding was

made to the Court of Criminal Appeals within the time prescribed by law and within a

reasonable time from the date on which the documents were requested to be transmitted.

4. Numerous requests for the transmittal of the application for writ of habeas corpus,

any answers filed, and a certificate reciting the date upon which that finding were made

have gone unanswered. Relator has made several requests in Ex parte Johnson Walter

Burris, No. CR08-00113, to the Honorable Teresa Drum, Presiding Judge of the 294th

Judicial District Court of Van-Zandt County, Texas, and to Karen L. Wilson, Van-Zandt

County District Clerk, by first-class mail requesting compliance with the statutory

provisions, to no avail.

5. To date, Relator has received no response from Respondent regarding Relator's

request for transmittal of a copy of the application for writ of habeas corpus, any answers

filed, and a certificate reciting the date upon which that finding was made to the Court of

Criminal Appeals.

6. As is clear from the record before the Court, Relator has repeatedly put

Respondent on notice that Relator seeks the copy of the application for writ Of habeas

corpus, any answers filed, and reciting the date upon which that finding was made to the

Court of Criminal and that such records are required by the Court of Criminal Appeals to

Burris Writ of Mandamus 4 act on Relator's writ of habeas corpus. Relator has gone well beyond any requirement or

obligations imposed upon him by the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. In contrast to

Relator's efforts, Respondent has wholly failed to comply with the Texas Code of

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Burris, Johnson Walter, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burris-johnson-walter-texapp-2015.