Burrell v. State

438 S.W.3d 514, 2014 WL 4078231, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 869

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Eugene Burrell (Movant) appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Movant contends that his trial attorneys were ineffective for: (1) failing to request a lesser-included offense jury instruction; (2) failing to offer a modified version of the self-defense instruction; and (3) failing to make adequate offers of proof at trial regarding his videotaped statement to police and a 911 call. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that the motion court did not clearly err in denying post-conviction relief. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memo randum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).