Burrell v. Metro Bus Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 25, 1996·No. 96-20104·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 96-20104 Conference Calendar __________________

ERIC BURRELL,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

METRO BUS COMPANY; BEN TAUB HOSPITAL; WILLIAMS D. LEDBETTER,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-95-CV-4707 - - - - - - - - - - April 17, 1996 Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Eric Burrell appeals the district court's dismissal of his

42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d)

based on the statute of limitations. Burrell's appeal is

DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS for failure to identify any error in the

district court's analysis. See Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy

Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987); 5th Cir.

R. 42.2. We caution Burrell that any additional frivolous

* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 96-20104 -2-

appeals filed by him will invite the imposition of sanctions. To

avoid sanctions, Burrell is further cautioned to review any

pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that

are frivolous because they have been previously decided by this

court.

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burrell v. Metro Bus Co., (5th Cir. 1996).

Burrell v. Metro Bus Co. (Burrell v. Metro Bus Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related