Burrell v. Jackson

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: May 14, 2004
• Docket: 03-1767
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-1767

CHARLES DAVIS BURRELL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

C. J. JACKSON,

Defendant - Appellee.

No. 03-1768

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (CA-03-198-3)

Submitted: November 26, 2003 Decided: May 14, 2004

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Davis Burrell, Appellant Pro Se. Edward Meade Macon, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

Charles Davis Burrell appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and

entering a pre-filing injunction. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. See Burrell v. Jackson, No.

CA-03-198-3 (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 21, 2003 & entered Apr. 22, 2003;

May 9, 2003). We deny Burrell’s motion for appointment of counsel.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -