Burrell v. Glascock Auto Sales, Inc.

Fourth Circuit

Burrell v. Glascock Auto Sales, Inc.

6 F. App'x 170

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 27, 2001·No. No. 00-2454·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Charles Davis Burrell appeals from the district court’s order granting the Defendants’ motion to dismiss. Because there is neither diversity of citizenship nor a federal question involved in the suit, the district court properly dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We, therefore, affirm. We dispense with oral argument, because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Charles Davis Burrell appeals from the district court’s order granting the Defendants’ motion to dismiss. Because there is neither diversity of citizenship nor a federal question involved in the suit, the district court properly dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We, therefore, affirm. We dispense with oral argument, because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Burrell v. Glascock Auto Sales, Inc., 6 F. App'x 170 (4th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

6 F. App'x 170 (Burrell v. Glascock Auto Sales, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.