Burrell v. Anderson

Fourth Circuit

Burrell v. Anderson

678 F. App'x 140

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 28, 2017·No. No. 16-7342·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Troy L. Burrell appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B), 1915A(b) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Burrell’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Burrell v. Anderson, No. 3:15-cv-00710-HEH-RCY, 2016 WL 5243397 (E.D. Va. Sept. 20, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Troy L. Burrell appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B), 1915A(b) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Burrell’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Burrell v. Anderson, No. 3:15-cv-00710-HEH-RCY, 2016 WL 5243397 (E.D. Va. Sept. 20, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Burrell v. Anderson, 678 F. App'x 140 (4th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

678 F. App'x 140 (Burrell v. Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related