Burrall v. Du Blois

2 U.S. 229
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 1, 1795·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

By the Court:

--The day on which the verdict was given should be reckoned inclusive; and, therefore, the motion in arrest of judgment has been made too late.

. But we have no doubt, that it is in our power to grant the plaintiff permission to enter the verdict on the proper count; and that it ought, in this case, to be granted.

The motion in arrest of judgment was accordingly dismissed, and the verdict entered on the first count.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burrall v. Du Blois, 2 U.S. 229 (1795).

2 U.S. 229 (Burrall v. Du Blois) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Winn v. Nilsen
1983 OK 91 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1983)