Burrage v. State

507 S.W.3d 617, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1311, 2016 WL 7385133
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 20, 2016
DocketED 104124
StatusPublished

This text of 507 S.W.3d 617 (Burrage v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burrage v. State, 507 S.W.3d 617, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1311, 2016 WL 7385133 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Marshall Burrage appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.151 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
507 S.W.3d 617, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1311, 2016 WL 7385133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burrage-v-state-moctapp-2016.