Burr v. United States

9 Cust. Ct. 13, 1942 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 744
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedJune 17, 1942
DocketC. D. 651
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 9 Cust. Ct. 13 (Burr v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burr v. United States, 9 Cust. Ct. 13, 1942 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 744 (cusc 1942).

Opinion

Cline, Judge:

This is a suit against the United States in which the plaintiff seeks to recover a part of the duty assessed at the rate of 3 cents per pound on 203 head of cattle (steers) weighing over 700 pounds each, entered for warehouse at Calexico, Calif., on July 29, 1939, and withdrawn on October 2, 1939. The plaintiff claims that a portion of the cattle should have been assessed at 1% cents per pound by virtue of the trade agreement with Canada (T. D. 49752) instead of at 3 cents per pound under paragraph 701 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the trade agreement. The provision in the trade agreement reads as follows:

Cattle, weighing seven hundred pounds or more each:
Cows, imported specially for dairy purposes_ 1 per lb.
Other- 1)4(5 per lb.
Provided, That after December 31, 1938, such cattle weighing seven hundred pounds or more each (other than.cows imported specially for dairy purposes) entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption in excess of 60,000 head in afiy quarter year shall not be entitled to a reduction in duty by virtue of this item, and such [15]*15cattle (other than cows imported specially for dairy purposes) entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption in excess of 225,000 head in any calendar year shall not be entitled to a reduction in duty by virtue of this item, but the rate of duty thereon shall not exceed_3jS per lb.
Provided further, That if, after consultation with the Government of the United States of America, the Government of Canada requests the allocation of the quantity entitled to enter at the reduced rate of duty under this item, the Government of the United States of America shall take the necessary steps to allocate the said quantity among countries of export on the basis provided for in Article III of this Agreement
# ’ í{5 í}{ i{i
Article III
If imports of any article into either country should be regulated either as regards the total amount permitted to be imported or as regards the amount permitted to. be imported at a specified rate of duty, and if shares are allocated to countries of export, the share allocated to the other country shall be based upon the proportion of the total imports of such article from all foreign countries supplied by that country in past years, account being taken in so far as practicable in appropriate cases of any special factors which may have affected or may be affecting the trade in that article. In those cases in which the other country is a relatively large supplier of any such article, the Government of the country imposing the regulation shall, whenever practicable, consult with the Government of the other country before the share to be-allocated to that country is determined.

On. February 27, 1939, tbe President, by proclamation (T. D. 49811), announced the number of head of cattle weighing oyer 700 pounds, other than cows imported specially for dairy purposes, from Canada and from other countries to be admitted at the lower rate of duty by virtue of the trade agreement with Canada. The following language appears in the proclamation:

Whereas I find that, taking into account special factors affecting the trade, imports into the United States of America from all countries of such cattle weighing seven hundred pounds or more each (other than cows imported specially for dairy purposes) during the years 1936 and 1937-were representative of the trade in such articles:
Whereas I find that the proportions of total imports into the United States of America for consumption of such cattle weighing seven hundred pounds or more each (other than cows imported specially for dairy purposes) supplied by Canada and by other foreign countries, respectively, during the years 1936 and 1937 were as follows:
Canada_86.2 per centum
Other foreign countries_ 13.8 per centum
Now, therefore, be it known that I, Fbaniclin D. Roosevelt, President of the United States of America, acting under the authority conferred by the said Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the said Act of June 12, 1934, as extended by the said Joint Resolution of March 1, 1937, do hereby proclaim that no more than 142,230 head of cattle weighing seven hundred pounds or more each (other than cows imported specially for dairy purposes), the produce of Canada, nor more than 22,770 head of such cattle, the produce of other foreign countries, entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for 'consumption during the period April 1 to [16]*16December 31, 1939, inclusive, shall be entitled to a reduction in duty by virtue of the said item 701 of Schedule II of the said Agreement; and that no more than 51,720 head of cattle weighing seven hundred pounds or more each (other than cows imported specially for dairy purposes), the produce of Canada, nor more than 8,280 head of such cattle, the produce of other foreign countries, entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption in any calendar quarter year during the period April 1 to December 31, 1939, inclusive, shall be entitled to a reduction in duty by virtue of the said item 701 of Schedule II of the said Agreement.

The plaintiff introduced as exhibit 1 a copy of a circular letter from the Commissioner of Customs (No. 1987), dated June 22, 1939, in which the procedure for the withdrawal of cattle under the terms of the trade agreement was prescribed. This instruction contains the following;

The following procedure will be followed in connection with the entry or withdrawal for consumption of cattle weighing 700 pounds or more each, other than dairy cows, FROM COUNTRIES OTHER THAN CANADA, under the quota for the THIRD QUARTER of the current calendar year, provided for in item 701, schedule II of the trade agreement with Canada (T. Ds. 49752 and 49811).
In order to afford equal opportunities at all ports for clearing cattle under the tariff rate quota on imports of this class of cattle at the beginning of the third quarterly quota period, all custom houses where entries or withdrawals for consumption of this class of cattle are likely to occur will open simultaneously on July 1, 1939, at 11:00 A. M., Eastern Standard Time, which will be 10:00 A. M. Central Standard Time, 9:00 A. M. Mountain Standard Time and 8:00 A. M. Pacific Standard Time.
Entries and withdrawals for consumption covering this class of cattle may be accepted at 1K(£ per pound, provided the delivery permit is not delivered to the importer or his agent pending determination of their quota status. If delivery of the permit is desired before such determination, importers shall be required to deposit estimated duties at the full tariff rate of per pound. In view of the provisions of section 315 of the Tariff Act of 1930, care shall be taken to issue permits of delivery concurrently with acceptance of warehouse withdrawals of this class of cattle, but delivery of permit shall be withheld unless estimated duties at 3‡ per pound are deposited. Cattle will not be released from customs custody until permit has been lodged with the storekeeper and he has released cattle to or upon order of the warehouse proprietor.

The plaintiff introduced as exhibit 2 a copy oí a circular letter from the Commissioner of Customs (No.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wolf D. Barth Co. v. United States
81 Cust. Ct. 127 (U.S. Customs Court, 1978)
Point Four Ltd. v. United States
78 Cust. Ct. 190 (U.S. Customs Court, 1977)
Protest 22263-K of Palomas Cattle Co.
9 Cust. Ct. 427 (U.S. Customs Court, 1942)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 Cust. Ct. 13, 1942 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 744, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burr-v-united-states-cusc-1942.