Burr v. Stanley

4 Edw. Ch. 27, 1839 N.Y. LEXIS 322, 1839 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 19
New York Court of Chancery·Decided October 12, 1839·Published

Opinion

The Vice-Chancellor :

These exceptions to the master’s report are not warranted; and it must be confirmed. The complainant will have to pay for redemption the two thousand eight hundred and fifty dollars and the ten per cent, interest, two hundred and eighty-five dollars,)as tendered, with interest on the two sums since the fifteenth day of May one thousand eight hundred and thirty-eight, inasmuch as the complainant has not shown that the moneys have been lying idle since the tender. The complainant is, then, entitled to the rents from May, one thousand eight hundred and thirty-seven,

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burr v. Stanley, 4 Edw. Ch. 27, 1839 N.Y. LEXIS 322, 1839 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 19 (N.Y. 1839).

4 Edw. Ch. 27 (Burr v. Stanley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.