Burr v. Stanley
This text of 4 Edw. Ch. 27 (Burr v. Stanley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
These exceptions to the master’s report are not warranted; and it must be confirmed. The complainant will have to pay for redemption the two thousand eight hundred and fifty dollars and the ten per cent, interest, two hundred and eighty-five dollars,)as tendered, with interest on the two sums since the fifteenth day of May one thousand eight hundred and thirty-eight, inasmuch as the complainant has not shown that the moneys have been lying idle since the tender. The complainant is, then, entitled to the rents from May, one thousand eight hundred and thirty-seven,
See Ruckman y. Astor, vol. 3, p. 373.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 Edw. Ch. 27, 1839 N.Y. LEXIS 322, 1839 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 19, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burr-v-stanley-nychanct-1839.