Burr v. Skinner

New York Supreme Court

Burr v. Skinner

1 Cole. Cas. 97

DecidedApril 15, 1800

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Cole. Cas. 97 (Burr v. Skinner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Burr v. Skinner, 1 Cole. Cas. 97 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1800).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

When a defendant in fuch cafe wiihes to fue out a commiffion, he muff give notice of it before he receives notice of trial, or within a reafonable time, according to circumftances, and fuch notice ihall flay proceedings: but if it is after notice of trial, he muff pay coils to that time. Here the defendant was negligent in waiting till he had fir ft received notice of trial, and he mull therefore pay coils. Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

When a defendant in fuch cafe wiihes to fue out a commiffion, he muff give notice of it before he receives notice of trial, or within a reafonable time, according to circumftances, and fuch notice ihall flay proceedings: but if it is after notice of trial, he muff pay coils to that time. Here the defendant was negligent in waiting till he had fir ft received notice of trial, and he mull therefore pay coils. Motion granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Cole. Cas. 97, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burr-v-skinner-nysupct-1800.