Burr v. Paterson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Burr v. Paterson

90 A.D.2d 503, 454 N.Y.S.2d 686, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18533

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 12, 1982

StatusPublished

This text of 90 A.D.2d 503 (Burr v. Paterson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Burr v. Paterson, 90 A.D.2d 503, 454 N.Y.S.2d 686, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18533 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review so much of a determination of respondent Secretary of State, dated February 27,1981, as, after a hearing, held that petitioner had demonstrated incompetency as a real estate broker and suspended his real estate broker’s license for one month, or in lieu thereof, imposed a fine of $1,000. Determination confirmed, insofar as reviewed, and proceeding dismissed on the merits, with costs. The determination is supported by substantial evidence. Furthermore, under the facts and circumstances of the case, the penalty imposed was proper (see Matter of Pell v Board ofEduc., 34 NY2d 222, 233). Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Rubin and Boyers, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review so much of a determination of respondent Secretary of State, dated February 27,1981, as, after a hearing, held that petitioner had demonstrated incompetency as a real estate broker and suspended his real estate broker’s license for one month, or in lieu thereof, imposed a fine of $1,000. Determination confirmed, insofar as reviewed, and proceeding dismissed on the merits, with costs. The determination is supported by substantial evidence. Furthermore, under the facts and circumstances of the case, the penalty imposed was proper (see Matter of Pell v Board ofEduc., 34 NY2d 222, 233). Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Rubin and Boyers, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

90 A.D.2d 503, 454 N.Y.S.2d 686, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18533, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burr-v-paterson-nyappdiv-1982.