Burr v. Goord

284 A.D.2d 778, 726 N.Y.S.2d 878, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6626
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 21, 2001·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Washington County) to review a determination of the Superintendent of Great Meadow Correctional Facility which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner challenges a determination finding him guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules prohibiting inmates from interfering with an employee, harassment and refusing a direct order. Contrary to petitioner’s contention, the misbehavior report, together with the testimony adduced at the hearing, constitute substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see, Matter of Foster v Coughlin, 76 NY2d 964, 966; Matter of Collazo v Senkowski, 282 AD2d 851, 852).

Crew III, J. P., Peters, Carpinello, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burr v. Goord, 284 A.D.2d 778, 726 N.Y.S.2d 878, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6626 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

284 A.D.2d 778 (Burr v. Goord) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Young v. Bennett
1 A.D.2d 846 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)