Burr v. Contenti

141 A. 769, 102 N.J. Eq. 597, 1 Backes 597, 1928 N.J. LEXIS 623

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The question presented on this appeal is identical with that considered and determined at the present term in the case of Henn v. Heath, Inc.

For the reason stated in the opinion filed in the case referred to, the portion of the decree appealed from in the present case will be affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisci-i, Black, Katzenbaci-i, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Yan Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 15.

For reversal — -None.