Burr v. Contenti

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Burr v. Contenti

141 A. 769, 102 N.J. Eq. 597, 1 Backes 597, 1928 N.J. LEXIS 623

DecidedMay 14, 1928

StatusPublished

This text of 141 A. 769 (Burr v. Contenti) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Burr v. Contenti, 141 A. 769, 102 N.J. Eq. 597, 1 Backes 597, 1928 N.J. LEXIS 623 (N.J. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The question presented on this appeal is identical with that considered and determined at the present term in the case of Henn v. Heath, Inc.

*598 For the reason stated in the opinion filed in the case referred to, the portion of the decree appealed from in the present case will be affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisci-i, Black, Katzenbaci-i, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Yan Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 15.

For reversal — -None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The question presented on this appeal is identical with that considered and determined at the present term in the case of Henn v. Heath, Inc.

*598 For the reason stated in the opinion filed in the case referred to, the portion of the decree appealed from in the present case will be affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisci-i, Black, Katzenbaci-i, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Yan Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 15.

For reversal — -None.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

141 A. 769, 102 N.J. Eq. 597, 1 Backes 597, 1928 N.J. LEXIS 623, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burr-v-contenti-nj-1928.