Burnside v. Harbor Freight Tools
This text of Burnside v. Harbor Freight Tools (Burnside v. Harbor Freight Tools) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. New Mexico primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO JOHNNY BURNSIDE, Plaintiff, v. CIV No. 21-0518 KG/CG
HARBOR FREIGHT TOOLS, Store #236, Defendant. ORDER OF REFERENCE In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. $$ 636(b)(1)(B), (b)(3), and Va. Beach Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n v. Wood, 901 F.2d 849 (10 Cir. 1990), this matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Garza to conduct hearings, if warranted, including evidentiary hearings, and to perform any legal analysis required to recommend to the Court an ultimate disposition of Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Doc. 7). The Magistrate Judge will submit an analysis, including findings of fact, if necessary, and recommended disposition, to the District Judge assigned to the case, with copies provided to the parties. The parties will be given the opportunity to object to the proposed findings, analysis, and disposition as described in 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Objections must be filed within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy of the proposed disposition. aielo—g UNITED STATES DISTRICTJUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Burnside v. Harbor Freight Tools, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burnside-v-harbor-freight-tools-nmd-2021.