Burns v. Williams
997 A.2d 1174, 606 Pa. 680
Opinion
PATRICK AND HELEN BURNS,
v.
R. CRAIG WILLIAMS AND KRISTEN FAY WILLIAMS, HURD MILLWORK COMPANY, BENTLEY HOME BUILDERS, LTD., GARVIN MITCHELL CORPORATION, CHADWELL REALTY ASSOCIATION, L.P., CHADWELL REALTY ASSOCIATION, INC., GENERAL PARTNER, HARRISON ESTATES,
v.
J.B.S. GENERAL CONTRACTING, PARRETT WINDOWS, ADVANCED WINDOW SUPPLY, INC., ADVANCED WINDOW SALES, INC., AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO ADVANCED WINDOW SUPPLY, INC., MIDATLANTIC PLASTERING, INC., HINKLE & MCLAUGHLIN, BULLARD COMPANY,
v.
STEVEN KRAEGEL D/B/A CEDAR TECH,
PETITION OF: HMC, INC., F/K/A HURD MILLWORK COMPANY, INC.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Middle District.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 22nd day of June, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Burns v. Williams, 997 A.2d 1174, 606 Pa. 680 (Pa. 2010).
997 A.2d 1174 (Burns v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.