Burns v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

503 F. App'x 214
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 7, 2013·No. No. 12-1903·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Raymond S. Burns, Jr. appeals the district court’s order granting the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority’s motion for summary judgment on his negligence complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Burns v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth., No. 1:12-cv-00123-CMH-TRJ (E.D.Va. July 13, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burns v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, 503 F. App'x 214 (4th Cir. 2013).

503 F. App'x 214 (Burns v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Manchanda v. Hays Worldwide, LLC
142 F. Supp. 3d 465 (E.D. Virginia, 2015)