Burns v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
This text of 503 F. App'x 214 (Burns v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Raymond S. Burns, Jr. appeals the district court’s order granting the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority’s motion for summary judgment on his negligence complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Burns v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth., No. 1:12-cv-00123-CMH-TRJ (E.D.Va. July 13, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
503 F. App'x 214, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burns-v-washington-metropolitan-area-transit-authority-ca4-2013.