Burns v. Thornburgh
Opinion
The revocation of the order to defalcate, is but equivalent to a refusal to defalcate in the first instance, which is not the subject of a writ of error. The power to set one judgment against another, is an inherent one, and' the only equitable power [79]*79which the common law courts originally possessed. Not being conferred by the statute, it is not a legal power, nor its exercise demand-able of right; and being discretionary, the propriety of its exercise cannot be questioned here, where we are incompetent to judge of the circumstances.
Writ quashed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
3 Watts 78 (Burns v. Thornburgh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.