Burns v. Staunton
134 A.D. 996
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1909·Published
Opinion
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except McLennan, P. J., who dissented upon the ground that the article was pot libelous per se, and that, therefore, the plaintiff is not entitled to recover.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Burns v. Staunton, 134 A.D. 996 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1909).
134 A.D. 996 (Burns v. Staunton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.