Burns v. Staunton
134 A.D. 996
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 15, 1909
StatusPublished
This text of 134 A.D. 996 (Burns v. Staunton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Burns v. Staunton, 134 A.D. 996 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1909).
Opinion
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except McLennan, P. J., who dissented upon the ground that the article was pot libelous per se, and that, therefore, the plaintiff is not entitled to recover.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
134 A.D. 996, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burns-v-staunton-nyappdiv-1909.