Burns v. State of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida

Burns v. State of Florida

116 So. 88, 95 Fla. 84

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided January 26, 1928·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The information upon which the plaintiff in error in this case was convicted, ran in the name of, and was signed, filed and sworn to by an assistant county solicitor, and the judgment of the court below must therefore be reversed upon the authority of Segars v. State, decided at the June Term, 1927, and Sawyer v. State, 113 So. 736.

Reversed.

Ellis, C. J., and Whitfield and Terrell, J., concur. Brown, J., dissenting. Strum, J., absent because of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The information upon which the plaintiff in error in this case was convicted, ran in the name of, and was signed, filed and sworn to by an assistant county solicitor, and the judgment of the court below must therefore be reversed upon the authority of Segars v. State, decided at the June Term, 1927, and Sawyer v. State, 113 So. 736.

Reversed.

Ellis, C. J., and Whitfield and Terrell, J., concur. Brown, J., dissenting. Strum, J., absent because of illness.

Burns v. State of Florida, 116 So. 88, 95 Fla. 84 (Fla. 1928).

Pincite

116 So. 88 (Burns v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.