Burns v. State
420 So. 2d 386, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28582
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Burns v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 433 So. 2d 997 →
Opinion
A trial judge’s findings should not be disturbed unless they are unsupported by the evidence. Sired v. State, 399 So.2d 964 (Fla.1981). In this court, a trial court’s ruling on a Motion to Suppress is clothed with a presumption of correctness, McNamara v. State, 357 So.2d 410 (Fla.1978), and reasonable inferences favor affirmance of the trial court. See Bova v. State, 392 So.2d 950 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980); Churney v. State, 348 So.2d 395 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Burns v. State, 420 So. 2d 386, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28582 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).
420 So. 2d 386 (Burns v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McNamara v. State
357 So. 2d 410 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1978)
Sireci v. State
399 So. 2d 964 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1981)
Bova v. State
392 So. 2d 950 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Churney v. State
348 So. 2d 395 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)