Burns v. State
This text of 420 So. 2d 386 (Burns v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A trial judge’s findings should not be disturbed unless they are unsupported by the evidence. Sired v. State, 399 So.2d 964 (Fla.1981). In this court, a trial court’s ruling on a Motion to Suppress is clothed with a presumption of correctness, McNamara v. State, 357 So.2d 410 (Fla.1978), and reasonable inferences favor affirmance of the trial court. See Bova v. State, 392 So.2d 950 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980); Churney v. State, 348 So.2d 395 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
420 So. 2d 386, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28582, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burns-v-state-fladistctapp-1982.