Burns v. State

120 So. 360, 97 Fla. 231
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedFebruary 19, 1929
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 120 So. 360 (Burns v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burns v. State, 120 So. 360, 97 Fla. 231 (Fla. 1929).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This canse having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no harmful error in the conduct of the trial of said cause. It does appear that the judgment is defective in that there is no clear adjudication of defendant’s guilt.

Reversed for proper judgment and sentence.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield and Buford, J. J., and Long, Circuit Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Corn v. State
332 So. 2d 4 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1976)
Cancela v. State
2 So. 2d 859 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1941)
Craig v. Noel
152 So. 185 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1933)
Anderson v. Chapman
146 So. 675 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
120 So. 360, 97 Fla. 231, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burns-v-state-fla-1929.