Burns v. State
120 So. 360, 97 Fla. 231
Opinion
This canse having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no harmful error in the conduct of the trial of said cause. It does appear that the judgment is defective in that there is no clear adjudication of defendant’s guilt.
Reversed for proper judgment and sentence.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Burns v. State, 120 So. 360, 97 Fla. 231 (Fla. 1929).
120 So. 360 (Burns v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Corn v. State
332 So. 2d 4 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1976)
Cancela v. State
2 So. 2d 859 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1941)
Craig v. Noel
152 So. 185 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1933)
Anderson v. Chapman
146 So. 675 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1933)