Burns v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Burns v. State

97 So. 609, 19 Ala. App. 384, 1923 Ala. App. LEXIS 217

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 10, 1923

Docket7 Div. 855.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 97 So. 609 (Burns v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Burns v. State, 97 So. 609, 19 Ala. App. 384, 1923 Ala. App. LEXIS 217 (Ala. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

The record in this ease is very crudely made. Th'ere are -many clerical errors, and the record in many particulars gives evidence of having been prepared by a novice. But there sufficiently appears the organization of the court, a valid indictment,' the defendant’s plea of former conviction, demurrers to the plea, a judgment sustaining the demurrer, the defendant’s plea of not guilty, and a verdict and judgment, of conviction. There is no bill of exceptions, and therefore we will not consider the oral charge of the court.

The rulings of the court on the demurrer to the plea were free from error. It has been held by the United States Supreme Court that a prosecution in the federal court for a violation of its laws does not bar a prosecution in the state court for a violation of a state law, based upon the same state of facts, Gilbert v. State, ante, p. 104, 95 South. 502.

We find no reversible error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAMFORD, J.

The record in this ease is very crudely made. Th'ere are -many clerical errors, and the record in many particulars gives evidence of having been prepared by a novice. But there sufficiently appears the organization of the court, a valid indictment,' the defendant’s plea of former conviction, demurrers to the plea, a judgment sustaining the demurrer, the defendant’s plea of not guilty, and a verdict and judgment, of conviction. There is no bill of exceptions, and therefore we will not consider the oral charge of the court.

The rulings of the court on the demurrer to the plea were free from error. It has been held by the United States Supreme Court that a prosecution in the federal court for a violation of its laws does not bar a prosecution in the state court for a violation of a state law, based upon the same state of facts, Gilbert v. State, ante, p. 104, 95 South. 502.

We find no reversible error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

97 So. 609, 19 Ala. App. 384, 1923 Ala. App. LEXIS 217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burns-v-state-alactapp-1923.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack