Burns v. Spiller

161 F.2d 377, 82 U.S. App. D.C. 91, 1947 U.S. App. LEXIS 2777
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided March 24, 1947·No. No. 9360·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, requires a complaint to contain “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief * * The District Court rightly dismissed appellant’s complaint, since it contained neither a short and plain statement nor any statement which showed that he was entitled to relief. The complaint undertakes to describe several episodes. Though it characterizes appellees’ alleged conduct as wrongful, unlawful, and malicious, it does not sufficiently disclose the conduct to enable a court to judge whether or not it was tortious.

The complaint shows that appellant and appellees were army officers. It may be that an official privilege covers the whole case, but we have no occasion to decide that broad question.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burns v. Spiller, 161 F.2d 377, 82 U.S. App. D.C. 91, 1947 U.S. App. LEXIS 2777 (D.C. Cir. 1947).

161 F.2d 377 (Burns v. Spiller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Crompton Corp. v. Clariant Corp.
221 F. Supp. 2d 683 (M.D. Louisiana, 2002)
Guidry v. United States Tobacco Co.
188 F.3d 619 (Fifth Circuit, 1999)
Slaff v. Slaff
151 F. Supp. 124 (S.D. New York, 1957)
Riley v. Titus
190 F.2d 653 (D.C. Circuit, 1951)